Revenue and Customs Brief 8 (2020) Change to partial exemption VAT treatment
Submit Articles Back to Articles
Published 10 June 2020
The Purpose of this brief
This brief advises businesses who supply goods by way of hire
purchase agreements of HMRC’s suggested method for apportionment
of VAT incurred on overheads following the Court of Justice of the
European Union (CJEU)
judgment C-153/17 Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd (VWFS).
Who should read this brief
Businesses who supply goods by way of hire purchase agreements.
finance house, provided credit to customers who wanted to purchase a
vehicle. It operated by purchasing the car from the dealer at the same
time as providing the car with finance to the customer, making all its
profit from the exempt supply of credit.
There was no disagreement that VWFS made a
mixed supply, but what was disputed was the extent to which the VAT
incurred on VWFS’s
overheads could be recovered.
The Supreme Court referred the case to the CJEU. The CJEU held that:
overhead costs were a component of the overall supply of goods - by way
of a hire purchase agreement
- there is a right to recovery even when the overheads are only set
against the exempt element for costing purposes
- a member state cannot exclude the value of the goods in a
values-based apportionment method, as that method would be less
accurate than the standard method
HMRC’s view is that a business supplying goods on hire
purchase should be allowed input tax recovery on its overheads where
the recovery is fair and reasonable. It does not follow that the
recovery will simply be fifty-fifty.
Where a business can evidence the use of its overheads in
transferring the asset as well as making the supply of credit there is
an entitlement to recover a proportion of the VAT incurred on
overheads. There is no fixed rate which can apply to this, as HMRC
recognises that this proportion will vary according to the type of hire
purchase agreement being provided and the specific arrangements in
has ruled that an output values-based apportionment calculation cannot
ignore the value of the asset if there is more than negligible use of
the input tax in making that taxable supply. Case C-511/10 Baumarkt
indicates that an apportionment calculation should only use an
allocation other than output values if it provides for a more precise
determination of the deductible proportion. It has not been possible to
identify any alternative allocation method which achieves this.
An output values-based method of apportionment therefore needs to be
applied which includes the value of the asset in order to reach a
proper apportionment of the residual input tax. HMRC’s position
is that the calculation should be as set out as:
Value of the asset plus any taxable additional charges or fees
received, multiplied by 100, divided by value of the asset plus value
of the credit granted - that is the value of the asset, plus
consideration for the credit as per the credit agreement and any
additional charges, related commission or other fees received.
This worked example is for illustrative purposes only.The actual
percentage arrived at will depend on the business’s actual
The value of asset is £10,000 and the value of credit
provided is £8,000 at 5% interest over 5 years plus additional
charges of £100 (for example an exempt arrangement fee).
The value is reduced to credit amount = £8,000.
Charge for finance (interest amount) is = £1,033.79.
Additional charges (exempt arrangement) = £100.
That is, £8,000 divided by
(£8,000+£8,000+£1,033.79+£100) multiplied by
100 = £8,000 divided by £17,133.79 multiplied by £100
This approach, of including the value of the credit granted, is
consistent with the approach of the CJEU in case
C-183/13 Banco Mais where the Court noted the distortion caused by
including the full value of the asset but only the charge for the
In that case the answer was to remove the value of the asset in
order to make the transactions comparable, however the CJEU has made it
clear that this is not the correct approach for a hire purchase
agreement transaction. Adding in the value of the credit granted is an
alternative means of eliminating this distortion.
Action to take
Email HMRC at email@example.com
where you have:
- recovered no overhead VAT on hire purchase supplies
- submitted error correction claims for overhead VAT on hire
- requested revisions to their partial exemption methods
- submitted proposals for a new partial exemption method
This partial exemption method will be the preferred method for the
industry. However, it will not be compulsory, and businesses can
continue to apply any fair and reasonable partial exemption method
already agreed with HMRC.
About the Author
© Crown Copyright 2020.
A licence is needed to reproduce this article and has been republished
for educational / informational purposes only. Article reproduced by
permission of HM Revenue & Customs.
Follow us @Scopulus_News
Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2020-06-10 17:05:08 in Tax Articles